Mission Drift: How Institutional Complexity Keeps New Space Off Course

The growing role of private companies has renewed public interest in space, along with visions of multi-planetary futures and promises to democratise access to space. Yet the New Space sector remains bound by substantial institutional constraints that limit both innovation and who can take part.

Drawing on institutional theory, this paper examines how competing logics – the state’s view of space as a sovereign domain, the market’s view of it as a commercial opportunity, and a marginalised community view of space as a commons – interact to form a “closed world structure” that insulates the field from critique. Using topic modelling and critical discourse analysis, it studies how this structure is created and maintained in language, and how it pushes space ventures towards mission drift while keeping alternative organisational forms from gaining legitimacy and support.

  1. Language across the sector privileges growth and economic returns over long-term mission preservation.
  2. Funders, universities and accelerators use remarkably similar language, which aspiring scientist-entrepreneurs internalise and reproduce.
  3. Mission drift begins at the level of discourse, often before an organisational form has been chosen.
  4. Alternative organisational, governance and IP models struggle to gain legitimacy, and with it the resources needed to challenge the status quo.

Cite this

Milne, G. and Honecker, F. (2025). Mission Drift: How Institutional Complexity Keeps New Space Off Course. Paper presented at the Linköping University Space Conference.

Related publications

Newsletter

New research, open events and the occasional argument. Roughly monthly.