Mission Drift: How Institutional Complexity Keeps New Space Off Course
Gemma Milne and Felix Honecker
Linköping University Space Conference · November 2025
Abstract
The growing role of private companies has renewed public interest in space, along with visions of multi-planetary futures and promises to democratise access to space. Yet the New Space sector remains bound by substantial institutional constraints that limit both innovation and who can take part.
Drawing on institutional theory, this paper examines how competing logics – the state’s view of space as a sovereign domain, the market’s view of it as a commercial opportunity, and a marginalised community view of space as a commons – interact to form a “closed world structure” that insulates the field from critique. Using topic modelling and critical discourse analysis, it studies how this structure is created and maintained in language, and how it pushes space ventures towards mission drift while keeping alternative organisational forms from gaining legitimacy and support.
Key findings
- 01Language across the sector privileges growth and economic returns over long-term mission preservation.
- 02Funders, universities and accelerators use remarkably similar language, which aspiring scientist-entrepreneurs internalise and reproduce.
- 03Mission drift begins at the level of discourse, often before an organisational form has been chosen.
- 04Alternative organisational, governance and IP models struggle to gain legitimacy, and with it the resources needed to challenge the status quo.
Cite this
Milne, G. and Honecker, F. (2025). Mission Drift: How Institutional Complexity Keeps New Space Off Course. Paper presented at the Linköping University Space Conference.
Related publications
The Science Philanthropy Vibe Shift
Gemma MilneScottish Deep Tech Report 2026
Felix Honecker, Gemma Milne, Dominic Chalmers and Jillian GordonNewsletter
New research, open events and the occasional argument. Roughly monthly.